Typography | Task 3A: Type Design & Communication
6/10/21 - 20/10/21 (Week 7 - Week 9)
Jane Chong Yun Ann
(0344255)
Typography/Free Elective in Bachelor of Design in Creative
Media
Task 2: Typographic Exploration & Communication
LECTURE NOTES
INSTRUCTIONS
<iframe
src="https://drive.google.com/file/d/17Pcc6te7YofVyQeTHGc726eL8o3sJSHD/preview"
width="640" height="480" allow="autoplay"></iframe>
EXERCISES
Task 3A: Type Design & Communication
To do list:
- Research
- Sketch the typefaces (5-6 designs, use o, a, t, h) and decide 1-2 strongest option
- Look for a reference from the 10 typefaces provided that looks closest to our sketch
- If your sketch does not look close to any of the 10, you may look for other reference **with caution**.
- Deconstruct the letter of said typeface (looking at the DETAILS)
- Digitize your sketch
- Refine?
- FontLab!
- Poster?
We were instructed to make a typeface for the letters and punctuations: a
i m e p y t g d o b ! , . A new term: overshoot!
Overshoot: The slight bit of a curved area that exceeds the baseline
and/or median line. This is because curved forms look smaller in general than
a straight-edged form.
Figure 1.1: Overshoot, Week 7 (6/10/21)
Research
Research is important, so we shall start with that first~
Figure 1.2: Font research, Week 7 (6/10/21)
I found myself leaning towards two main type of fonts: elegant, almost
royal-like fonts and minimalistic, futuristic fonts that has geometric
influences. The cat font was just included because I like cats, and I found it
so so adorable. I probably won't make a cat-like font...probably; readability
may not be its strongest suite.
The letters we need to create a typeface for are in lowercase form, so
geometrical elements (such as Voyager) may not be suitable. Nevertheless, time
to sketch :D A note to keep in mind: we are creating a ~display~ type of
typeface, meaning it is not meant to be in long bodies of text but to be
boldly ~displayed~.
Sketches
Mr Vinod said we should create 5-6 design sketches based on our research. I
used a grid paper to maintain height evenness (though, not accurate in terms
of cap height and ascender and descender).
Figure 2.1: Too many sketches, Week 7 (8/10/21)
Yeah...I did a little too many, but I believe I had good reason - I took so
long to start, and once I started, suddenly I had so many ideas I want to try
:,D. I think the progression of "how do I even start" to "what if I tried this
variation or this variation" can be seen from the sketches top-down. Though
quantity is a strong suit, some of its quality can be...questionable. I
personally liked the ones that look like abstract shapes (1st & 2nd
column, 5th row), the ones that had exaggerated contrasts on weights and the
royal sans serif one (2nd column, 1st row). I also showed it to a few people
to get their opinions; needless to say it was very varied.
SO after some deep thought, I settled on the ones that emphasized the
different weights (row 7). Maybe when I have some free time I will try
creating the wavy bold one. My reasoning behind this decision took the
practicality and the amount of time it may take to create the font into
account - time may not be on my side. The dynamic contrast between the thick
and thin strokes looked very appealing as well. So I started deconstructing
sans serif font types (using Futura Std Book) and also slab serif types (using
Serifa Std Roman) just in case I wanted to change the font design in the
future.
Figure 2.2: Finalized sketches 1, Week 8 (12/10/21)
Figure 2.3: Finalized sketch 2 (if there's enough time), Week 8
(12/10/21)
Deconstructing Typeface
Following Mr Vinod's tutorial we created guidelines including the baseline,
median (forming an x-height of 500px), ascender, descender, and cap height.
Figure 3.1: Creating guidelines, Week 7 (6/10/21)
Sans Serif | Deconstructing Futura Std Book
Observations:
- The stroke of the curve in 'b' is not uniform and it is not a circle
- The curves in 'm' is not identical; the right counter seems larger
- The stroke of the curves in 'm' is not uniform too
- The two strokes of y intersect above the baseline
- Even stroke width in all vertical strokes of 'm'
- Have relatively higher ascender
Slab Serif | Deconstructing Serifa Std Roman
Figure 3.3: Deconstructing Serifa Std Roman, Week 8 (12/10/21)
Observations:
- Top slab widths were slightly larger than bottom slab widths, just slightly
- The counters of 'm' are identical
- Curved strokes in 'b', 'm' and 'P' are not uniform
- Cap height and ascender height are the same
- Has relatively shorter descender height
Digitize
Things to note:
- Board must be 1000px in height
- x-height of our typeface MUST be 500px.
Figure 4.1: First attempts of design #1, Week 8 (12/10/21)
Figure 4.2: First attempts of design #2, Week 8 (12/10/21)
Figure 4.3: First attempts of design #3, Week 8 (12/10/21)
Following the feedback given, I did realize the inconsistencies in my design
and took note of them. Let's go through it font by font~
Design #1
Figure 4.3: Second attempt of design #2, Week 9 (19/10/21)
I felt this was just..'meh'. I did experiment a little with the 'O' as the
original design began to look weird, small and out of porportion. But other
than that, I decided to not continue with this font as 1) I lost inspiration
for it and 2) the other designs felt more exciting.
Design #2
Figure 4.4: Second attempt of design #1, Week 9 (19/10/21)
As per feedback, I started with the base of the letters - just focusing on which part of the letter will have a heavy-weighted stroke and so on. I followed what Mr Vinod suggested and created copies of different shapes to be used throughout so that the consistency remains. You can find the behind-the-scenes screenshot below :D.
Next, I added a slanted edge to all of the bolded strokes (except e and o).
Figure 4.5: Anchor points in construction, Week 9 (19/10/21)
Figure 4.6: Edgy version of design #1, Week 9 (19/10/21)
The slanted edges definitely added more visual interest to the letters and the
font as a whole. You may have noticed an extra 'h' and 'n', that was because I
was too obsessed with the word 'oath' in my sketches that 'h' subconsciously
stayed in my mind. The 'n' was just a quick by-product from 'h'. I struggled
mainly with 'y' because of the tail-to-body ratio. In the end, the other 'y's
either did not fit the font theme, did not fit the x-height, or was just had
unfavourable proportions.
Figure 4.7: (Rejected) Variations of 'y' for design #1, Week 9
(19/10/21)
Figure 4.8: Word testing of potential font name, "entity", Week 9
(19/10/21)
Design #3
Mr Vinod said to attempt this when I feel like I have a lot of time. Well here
I am, not with a lot of time but with a lot of other *uninterested* things I
pushed aside for this (it's a good thing, don't worry).
Figure 4.9: Second attempt of design #3, Week 9 (19/10/21)
Figure 4.10: Anchor points in construction, Week 9 (19/10/21)
Wow this was..an experience. It was trickier to copy the shapes as each curve
was different. I struggled with the tail of the 'y' for quite a bit as the
original one had a much longer and 'flair'-ey tail. But the main design of it
is still intact. The 'h' and 'n', as mentioned before, are additionals. Since
I did it for design #2 I decided to add it here as well. The letter 't' went
through some variations as well, but I felt that the other versions were a
little complicated, and this one was consistent with the 'i' (and 'l', if
there is).
Figure 4.11: (Rejected) Variations of 't' in design #3, Week 9
(19/10/21)
Figure 4.12: Word testing of potential font name, "blob" and "glob", Week 9
(19/10/21)
Figure 4.13: Behind-the-scenes - an organized mess, Week 9 (19/10/21)
After getting feedback and adjusting accordingly, the final type design:
Figure 4.14: Final typeface design, 'Glob' - JPG, Week 9 (22/10/21)
Ascender - 733px
Cap Height - 696px
X-Height - 500px
Descender - -245px
Generating Font
The process of integrating my font from AI to FontLab is anything BUT smooth.
In other words, omygosh FontLab does not like me and I do not like
FontLab. From missing counters, uGly watermark/logo placing because it is a
demo version, files "unsaving" itself(???) and my other petty mistakes, it was
something I don't think I want to do ever again :,)... Much respect to the
typographers who create fonts with this.
Figure 5.1: Font generation went wrong, Week 9 (22/10/21)
Anyhow, my formula was not to use either FontLab5 or FontLab7, but BOTH;
Copy-paste the shapes from AI to FontLab5 (because FontLab7 cannot recognize
the counter shapes for some forbidden reason) AND adjust all the kerning
BEFORE saving (because it "unsaves", I had to learn it the hard way). Open
FontLab7 and open that folder you just saved, and export said font (to avoid
the horrendous watermarks from FontLab5).
I got to kerning the letters and typed out some testing words to adjust those
kerning as well.
Figure 5.2: Adjusting kerning of different combinations, Week 9
(22/10/21)
I am then able to export it using FontLab 7 and install the font in my computer :D. To test it I used it as a font for one of my long-worded assignments.
Figure 5.3: An example of how NOT to use this font, Week 9 (22/10/21)
Figure 5.4: Final kerned letters - JPG, Week 9 (22/10/21)
After adjusting its kerning, I moved on to creating a poster to showcase the
font. I came up with several compositions with minimal graphical
elements.
Figure 5.5: Poster 1 "I! am a type god, obey me!", Week 10
(26/10/21)
Figure 5.6: Poster 2 "Hi Glob!", Week 10 (26/10/21)
Figure 5.7: Poster 3 "Hi Glob!", Week 10 (26/10/21)
Figure 5.8: Poster 4 "Hello. I, am Glob!", Week 10 (26/10/21)
I personally liked Poster 1 and 3 (Fig 5.7) as it fitted the theme of the
font. Poster 1 shows how the font can look in phrases with more words, while
Poster 3 showcases that the font can be arranged in a playful style.
Final Submissions
Figure 5.9: Final "Glob" font design - JPG, Week 10 (26/10/21)
Figure 5.10: Final "Glob" font design - PDF, Week 10 (26/10/21)
Figure 5.11: Final "Glob" poster(s) - PDF, Week 10 (26/10/21)
Font Playground - Type Something~
Only limited characters available (sry): a i e m p y t d g o b h n l ! , .
Time Allocation
Sketch: ~1-2 hours
Type Deconstruction: ~1.5 hours
Digitization: ~ 4 - 5 hours
FontLab and its issues: ~3-4 hours
Adding Playground (and Debugging): ~1.5 hours
Total: ~11 - 14 hours
FEEDBACK
Week 8
Specific Feedback: Good exploration, should start from
determining the key features and keep it consistent throughout the letters
(such as the place of weight, shapes involved), need to use thicker strokes
in general.
Week 9
General Feedback: We need to deconstruct and analyze the construction
of a typeface more thoroughly to understand the basic shape and form of each
letter.
Specific Feedback: (For Glob) the typeface is nicely designed! The
dots in the letters (except o and e) can be removed and the dots for the
punctuations need to be larger.
Week 10
Specific Feedback: Excellent sketch exploration. Good variety in
exploration. Well done! O wow! you managed to figure out "font playground"
|..|
REFLECTION
Experience
Creating and thinking of font designs were a little tough to start, but once
I had it flowing it was hard to stop. I had a lot of fun (maybe too much
fun) experimenting with different font types, from typical serif types to
abstract shapes. Digitizing the fonts was pretty positive for the most part.
I think as I constructed each letter, I started to realize the small details
put into each letter, how it all relates to each other (eg: 'o' can
influence 'a', 'b', 'p' and 'h' can influence 'm' and 'n', etc..) to create
consistency. It increases my appreciation for good typeface designs and
typographers in general.
FontLab was an experience birthed from an array of problems popping up here
and there...never again.
Observations
Other students' also had very interesting and creative work! Some were
deceptively simple but was very consistent and unique in its own way. It was
very inspirational and fun to see what others came up with~
Findings
Creating a font required a lot more consistency than I had expected. There
is a lot of attention spent on the small details of each letter and how it
looks/compliments each other overall. Other than the design, the kernings
also need to have some attention paid to it so that the spacings look
consistent.
FURTHER READING
From the book list that were recommended, I chose "Typographic design:
Form and Communication" by Rob Carter, Philip B. Meggs, Ben Day, Sandra
Maxa and Mark Sanders.
Reference: Carter, B., Day, B., Meggs, P. B., Maxa, S., & Sanders, M.,
(2015). Typographic design: Form and Communication. Hoboken, New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Figure 6.1: Book cover of Typographic design: Form and Communication,
Week 7 (6/10/21)
I read on the chapter "Typography in Time and Motion". There are a number of
elements to take into account when deciding the structure and hierarchy of a
kinetic/dynamic type design.
Time and sequence
Having a foundation for the principles of animation and film increases the
potential of the dynamic type design. The timing and sequence can be
manipulated to tell a story, and sometimes the order of that story is not
straightforward. Different motions and flows of the type creates different
types of moods and it all engages with the viewers.
Figure 6.2: Example of time and sequence by Level Design Group, Week 9
(19/10/21)
Structures
The order of revealing each new element is important to portray the message
correctly. The meaning and interpretation of the message should be reflected
in the designers' presentation of the idea. A technique called montage can
be used, whereby the order of frames can be used to convey a meaning or
message.
Continuity is also important, which is the feeling of space and time. The
viewer's sense of time can be maintained when there are continuous visual
elements that clearly convey visual links between two different frames. This
can be done by:
- Maintaining the positions of major subjects in the frame of each shot
- Chronological events
- Linking through visual connectors such as line, form, colour, or image
Figure 6.3: Continuity example (by Sandra Maxa), Week 9
(19/10/21)
Hierarchy
There should be an established hierarchy of visual elements in the design.
The weight, size, and colour of the typeface plays a role in this. The
position of the type in the frame also tells the reader which is the more
important element. The order at which the words appear can affect the
hierarchy as well, alongside the timing and behaviour of the word (such as
speed and sound added).
Figure 6.4: Hierarchy example (by Hong Wei), Week 9 (19/10/21)
Comments